``` --- ## Fix 2 — Project Settings → Custom Code → Head **Où :** Dans Webflow, clique sur l'icône ⚙️ **Project Settings** (en haut à gauche) > onglet **Custom Code** > section **Head Code**. **Quoi :** Dans le bloc JSON-LD `Organization` qui est déjà là, ajoute cette ligne juste après `"@type": "Organization",` : ``` "@id": "https://www.cognitive-design-systems.com/#organization",
Industrial

Cost-Driven Design Exploration for a Pharmaceutical Rotary Filler Link Family

This case study shows how engineering teams re-engineer a titanium actuation link for a pharmaceutical rotary filler to validate the best manufacturing route and reduce moving mass across a 16-variant family. Parallel exploration across casting, CNC, and LPBF identified CNC as the cost-optimal option (‑12% recurring cost) while delivering a 14% mass reduction and a 4× faster full-family engineering lead time.
Cost-Driven Design Exploration for a Pharmaceutical Rotary Filler Link Family

The Part

A titanium nozzle actuation link from a high-speed rotary liquid filler, coupling a servo-driven cam to a reciprocating nozzle carrier for precise volumetric dosing. The component cycles at 2 to 3 Hz over service lives exceeding 10^8 cycles, in a GMP environment requiring full CIP/SIP chemical resistance. Ti-6Al-4V was the only material satisfying both very-high-cycle fatigue performance and cleanability requirements simultaneously.

The Challenge

The legacy design was structurally sound. The pressure driving redesign came from two directions.

Procurement needed the cost-optimal manufacturing route validated at concept stage, before any tooling commitment. At the same time, the OEM's customers increasingly track reciprocating moving mass as a TCO and ESG metric, given its direct relationship to lifetime servo energy draw.

A third constraint compounded both: the same link topology covers 16 variants across 4 machine platforms and 4 nozzle configurations, and redesigning each variant independently was accumulating 32 weeks of engineering lead time per family cycle.

The Approach

The engineering team evaluated three manufacturing routes simultaneously at concept stage, with manufacturing constraints, structural validation, and cost modeling running in parallel rather than in sequence. The route selection outcome was not the one procurement initially anticipated.

The case study details the full multi-process exploration setup, the cost model logic that drove the final route decision, and the workflow architecture that makes the remaining 15 family variants regenerate in a fraction of the original lead time.

Key Results

  • -12% recurring cost per part, manufacturing route confirmed at concept stage
  • -14% moving mass, with a stronger safety factor than the legacy design
  • 4x faster full-family engineering lead time, across 16 variants

The case study includes the complete before/after metrics table, FEA validation data, and NRC amortization breakdown.

Why It Matters

This project illustrates what changes when cost, performance, and manufacturability are evaluated together at concept stage, rather than sequentially after geometry is already fixed. The implications extend beyond this specific part family.

Download the case study to see the full workflow, route selection logic, and results breakdown.

Interested in reading the full case study?

Fill in the form below to instantly receive the full case study.

Thank you for filling out the form!
You can find the full case study PDF on the link below.
Get the full case study PDF
PDF Icon
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Innovate

Built for the Cognitive Era of Engineering

Shorten product development cycle from the earliest concept phase.

50
x
faster

Product engineering cycle

7
x
faster

Product engineering cycle

Reusability of engineering workflows

Unlock Your Design Potential

Request a demo to see how Cognitive Design by CDS can revolutionize your engineering workflow